CASE RESULTS

17 results found.

NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS M.L.

M.L was accused of shooting an individual causing paralysis. ML was looking at 31 years to life. State produced two eye-witnesses that were discredited through cross examination.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS J.H.

J.H was charged with attempted first degree murder he was facing a 31 years minimum. He was accused of shooting a fourteen year old girl at Morgan Park High School in Chicago Illinois. At trial through creative and skillful cross examination and argument we are able to show that his arrest was a product of sloppy police work and we produced the best result for our client which was not guilty.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS S.C.

S.C was charged with arson. It was alleged that he set his girl friends car on fire. We took the matter to trial and the court found the eye witness account of the incident was not credible and found my client not guilty.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS J.M.

In this case J.M was charged with committing a battery by stabbing the complaining witness. My client was simple defending him self against a person twice his size. My client was being punched repeatedly when he stabbed the complaining witness in the chest.


DISMISSED

PEOPLE VS M.M.

M.M was charged with possession of a look like substance being heroin. He was charged with 100 grams. In Illinois when a person is charged with a look like substance he faces the same penalties of having possession of the same substance. This case was dismissed at the preliminary hearing because of an illegal search.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE V. D.L.

D.L was charged with aggravated assault with a firearm. The allegations were that D.L. discharged a firearm in the direction of two individuals. The creative and in genius trail strategy we produced the only result that counts Not Guilty.


DISMISSED

PEOPLE VS S.P.

S.P was charged with Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon, which is a non probational charge. After a motion to suppress evidence the court determined the firearm was recovered pursuant to an illegal search.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS J.R.

J.R was charged with a DUI. After a bench trial we showed that all field sobriety tests were administered incorrectly and the State did not meet their burden.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS. H.I.

H.I was charged with DUI and illegal transportation of Alcohol. We are able to refute the States evidence.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS. M.K.

M.K was charged with driving under the influence of drugs. At trial were able to refute the states evidence that he was not under the influence of any substance.


MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE GRANTED

PEOPLE VS. M.J.

M.J was charged with Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon. Police officers searched MJ’s vehicle and found a firearm. After a Motion to Suppress Evidence we are able to show MJ’s vehicle was searched illegally .


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS H.B

H.B was charged with Aggravated Unlawful of a Weapon. After bench trial we were able to show that HB was in lawful possession of the firearm.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE vs. R.T.

R.T was charged with Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Distribute. Officer stated that he had RT on surveillance selling narcotics. We took it to trial exposed the officers lie and won.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS O.L.

O.L was charged with Domestic Battery. Through skillful cross examination and argument we are able to show that the State did not meet their burden.


MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE GRANTED

PEOPLE VS A.J

A.J was charged with Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon after police searched his vehicle and found a firearm. AJ’s acceptance to a university was revoked because of this charged. We challenged the search and WON, and A.J.was able to attend the university.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS M.G.

M.G was charged with Aggravated Battery. He was alleged to battery the complaining witness with a fire arm. During the trial the complaining witness was exposed as a liar through the impeachment process and his testimony was discredited.


NOT GUILTY

PEOPLE VS L.C.

Domestic violence case where our client was accused of hitting his spouse however there were no injuries that matched the false accusations of the witness. Through firm cross-examination and impeachment of the witness at trial we produced a not guilty.